Water and Distributed Systems Disaster Response Plan Paper

For this assignment, you are to develop a proposed plan that will be inserted into a disaster response plan related to providing water for a community. You are to assume that you will be drawing water from a surface water supply system and treating it through an emergency designed and installed treatment system. You will be developing a storage facility and a transportation system and distribution system for the water that your product.

Activity Directions

Begin by writing your name above. Then, using the resources described in the Module 14 Assignment folder you are to develop a proposed plan that will be inserted into a disaster response plan related to providing water for a community. You are to assume that you will be drawing water from a surface water supply system and treating it through an emergency designed and installed treatment system. You will be developing a storage facility and a transportation system and distribution system for the water that your produce. Your plan to be in your own words and is to be at least 500 words in length. The following sections will be included:

• Water Intake
• Treatment
• Decontamination
• Temporary emergency storage
• Transport equipment
• Distribution network concept

You can use Water supply in disasters and emergencies as a resource in developing your document. Do not copy and paste text directly from the document.

You may wish to insert graphics from the document as additional information to support your position.

Score	Evaluation Criteria
Total score 100%	Meets all the criteria necessary for an A+ grade. Well formatted and instructions sufficiently followed. Well punctuated and grammar checked.
Above 90%	Ensures that all sections have been covered well, correct grammar, proofreads the work, answers all parts comprehensively, attentive to passive and active voice, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness, plagiarism-free
Above 75%	Meets most of the sections but has not checked for plagiarism. Partially meets the professor’s instructions, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 60%	Has not checked for plagiarism and has not proofread the project well. Out of context, can be cited for plagiarism and grammar mistakes and not correctly punctuated, fails to adhere to the professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 45%	Instructions are not well articulated. Has plenty of grammar mistakes and does not meet the quality standards needed. Needs to be revised. Not well punctuated
Less than 40%	Poor quality work that requires work that requires to be revised entirely. Does not meet appropriate quality standards and cannot be submitted as it is to the professor for marking. Definition of a failed grade
Alternative url	www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow/www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow/

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

The post Water and Distributed Systems Disaster Response Plan Paper appeared first on Perfect Grade.

Disaster Management Discussion Board Paper

Disaster management discussion Board Questions

1. Week 1 Discussion Forum

This week, explain the various responsibilities and services of FEMA when a disaster occurs in the United States. Do some research on past disasters, and describe how FEMA supported the community and disaster efforts. Address 2-3 of the following.

How did FEMA help people prepare for the disaster?

What services did FEMA provide to the community?

Who else participated in the disaster relief efforts?

How much monetary damage was caused by the disaster? Or, how much did FEMA spend in relief?

What was public perception of FEMA and the response they provided?

Provide links to your sources for others to reference.

Support your answer with evidence from the disasters that you researched.

2. Week 2 Discussion Forum

Watch the videos and answer the questions that follow.

1. https://www.youtube.com/embed/zP4rgvu4xDE?rel=0
2. https://www.youtube.com/embed/e7ho6z32yyo?rel=0Earthquakes (Video 2:56)
3. https://www.youtube.com/embed/dJBS94GVyuo?rel=0Tsunamis (Video 3:28)
4. https://www.youtube.com/embed/5hghT1W33cY?rel=0Wildfires (Video 3:12)

Choose one of the natural disasters represented in the videos above and answer the following:

What are some of the nursing implications of this disaster?

What diseases do you need be concerned about and how would you protect yourself and others? Be specific.

Support your answer with evidence from scholarly sources.

3. Week 3 Discussion Forum

For this week’s discussion, you are asked to research a bioterrorist incident. Begin by reviewing the Media Focus video on bioterrorism in Week 3 of the Content and Activities, then explore the Internet.

Give an example and details from national/international news of a bioterrorist attack.

Address all of the following in your post:

• What was the classification of biological agent used in the attack?
• Discuss the implications of the biological agent.
• Discuss the therapy for the biological agent.
• What are the decontamination procedures for the biological agent used in the attack?
• Define the appropriate level of PPE required for this type of biological agent?
• In your post, provide the name of the incident you have chosen, and support your answers with evidence/examples. Please provide a working link and a citation for your source(s).

Support your answer with evidence from scholarly sources.

4. Week 4 Discussion Forum

For this week’s discussion, we will be looking at local or national response protocols that were initiated during a critical incident, and you will choose your topic!

Search reputable local and national media for a man-made disaster to discuss.

Search for critical instances such as: hostage situations, mass shootings, multiple-vehicle or mass transit accidents with multiple critical injuries, and disease outbreaks.

In your initial post, describe the incident and address the following:

• Determine the incident type and explain your reasoning.
• What resources were deployed for this incident?
• What protocols were implemented successfully, and which were unsuccessful?
• Discuss way to improve the response to this type of incident in the future.

Support your answer with evidence. ​ Please provide a working link to your story source.

5. Week 5 Discussion Forum

We have already discussed weather related natural disasters and bioterrorism, and now we will focus on other types of disasters. For this week’s discussion, you are asked to research a technological or human induced disaster.

(This not the same as in Weeks 3 and 4 where you might have discussed hostage situations, mass shootings, multiple-vehicle or mass transit accidents with multiple critical injuries, bioterrorism, and disease outbreaks.) Here you want to look at situations such as radiological, nuclear accidents, technological disasters (electromagnetic pulse), and hazardous material spills.

In your post, provide the name of the incident you have chosen, and support your answers with evidence/examples. Please provide a working link and a citation for your source(s).

Select 2 of the items below to discuss:

• At what point does a technological or man-made event become labeled a disaster?
• Name and explain the impact categories associated with your disaster.
• How well do you think the United States is prepared for a disaster like the one you selected?
• Discuss the factors that can influence the effects a disaster may have on a community or region.
• What nursing interventions would be a priority for these victims?
• What community resources should be provided to the victims for follow up needs?
• Support your answer with evidence from scholarly sources.

6. Week 6 Discussion Forum

This week, read the journal article “Challenges and Resources for Participating in a Hurricane Sandy Hospital Evacuation” and complete the activity below.

https://learn-us-east-1-prod-fleet01-xythos.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/5c12b64692d5f/4172331?response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%2A%3DUTF-8%27%27Hurricane%2520Sandy%2520Article-Week%25206.pdf&response-content-type=application%2Fpdf&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Date=20200330T202359Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=21600&X-Amz-Credential=AKIAZH6WM4PLTYPZRQMY%2F20200330%2Fus-east-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Signature=efcce76e24e6c915a990e430bad1cc751b7080e60e648f11836831798ee63d26

After completing the activity, discuss your role as a nurse in disaster preparedness and response. Describe your current patient population and discuss the challenges you might face in carrying out your responsibilities in a disaster.

How could you gain more hands-on training to supplement your academic study of disaster management? How could you feel more prepared? Discuss different training options that you could participate in (e.g., CERT training).

Support your answer with evidence from scholarly sources.

7. Week 7 Discussion Forum

This week you will put together your 72-hour disaster home “go bag” and evaluate your preparedness.

Here are the steps for your initial post:

1. Use the lists available at the Ready.gov website, FEMA, or the Red Cross website to gather items for your 72-hour home go bag. Add additional items that you think will be useful and essential for your family. (You are not required to purchase items, but you may if you choose.)

https://www.ready.gov/kit

https://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/90354

https://www.redcross.org/get-help/how-to-prepare-for-emergencies.html

2. Post a picture of all of the items you have gathered for your go bag. For the sake of personal and family privacy, keep personal/private items out of the photograph; you may list them (e.g., prescription medications).

You must take and submit a picture of your own items! You may not post a picture from the internet or any other source.

• Along with your photo, include the following information:
• A discussion of the items in your home go bag – what is present and what is missing.
• A brief explanation of the demographic considerations and potential disaster hazards in your area and why you included certain items.
• Your family, pets, and living situation considerations and why you included certain items.
• Are you prepared to help others in your community in the event of a disaster?
• Support your answers with evidence from scholarly sources.

Additional Resources

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/03/smarter-living/packing-emergency-kit-disaster.html

https://www.mysafela.org/survival-kit/

8. Week 8 Discussion Forum

Review the American Nurses Association (ANA) Code of Ethics

https://learn-us-east-1-prod-fleet01-xythos.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/5c12b64692d5f/4297897?response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%2A%3DUTF-8%27%27Code%2520for%2520Ethics%2520for%2520Nurses%2520with%2520Interpretive%2520Statements_2015.pdf&response-content-type=application%2Fpdf&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Date=20200330T203100Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=21600&X-Amz-Credential=AKIAZH6WM4PLTYPZRQMY%2F20200330%2Fus-east-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Signature=b58ad11e14923565b55c2149fda5831d5e9bdd6ae977b839cc11f79fe5c74da9

Address the questions below in your discussion post this week:

• Does the law require you to respond in disaster situations?
• Do RNs have a contractual responsibility to respond in disaster situations?
• Are you familiar with the laws in your state?

Support your answers with evidence from scholarly sources.

9. Week 9 Discussion Forum

For this week’s discussion, click on the Additional Resources folder located on the main menu. Scroll down to Week 9 Resources.

https://emergency.cdc.gov/coping/index.asp

Choose one of the websites to visit and explore. Choose a subject/topic that you find most interesting. Provide a link to the website and the source citation in your post.

Address all of the following:

• Why did you select this resource/site? Why do you find the subject/topic interesting?
• What is the one thing you want others to know about this subject/topic that is found on the website?
• What information had the greatest impact on you? Explain.

Support your answers with evidence from the site that you visited and provide a citation for that website.

Disaster Management Discussion Board Paper

Score	Evaluation Criteria
Total score 100%	Meets all the criteria necessary for an A+ grade. Well formatted and instructions sufficiently followed. Well punctuated and grammar checked.
Above 90%	Ensures that all sections have been covered well, correct grammar, proofreads the work, answers all parts comprehensively, attentive to passive and active voice, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness, plagiarism-free
Above 75%	Meets most of the sections but has not checked for plagiarism. Partially meets the professor’s instructions, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 60%	Has not checked for plagiarism and has not proofread the project well. Out of context, can be cited for plagiarism and grammar mistakes and not correctly punctuated, fails to adhere to the professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 45%	Instructions are not well articulated. Has plenty of grammar mistakes and does not meet the quality standards needed. Needs to be revised. Not well punctuated
Less than 40%	Poor quality work that requires work that requires to be revised entirely. Does not meet appropriate quality standards and cannot be submitted as it is to the professor for marking. Definition of a failed grade
Alternative url	www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow/www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow/

Disaster Management Discussion Board Paper

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

The post Disaster Management Discussion Board Paper appeared first on Perfect Grade.

Environmental Science Hurricane Michael Disaster Management Paper

As you study the evolution of emergency management you will  come across references to real disaster situations and how emergency  management responded to handle such events.  Much can be learned about  the discipline through such case studies. write a paper on a particular emergency or  disaster situation from the list below that has occurred in the United  States and describe the “lessons learned”.  Using these lessons, I would  like you, at the end of the paper, to identify viable ways that key  lessons could be implemented so agencies handle future incidents better  and do not repeat mistakes made on the identified incident.

1)     A review of current literature on the  particular emergency or disaster to include citations from your textbook  and a minimum of three other publications,

2)     An introduction that includes the background of the event,

3)     A description of the “lessons learned” from the event ,

4)     Your analysis of how such a situation (or the  impact of such a situation) can be prevented in the future or how the  response to a similar emergency or disaster that occur in the future can  be improved upon. This should include how principles learned during the  class from your textbook could be applied (such as use of the N.R.F.,  N.I.M.S., etc.)

5)     Identify viable ways of implementing lessons learned solutions on future incidents.

Structure a real argument and tell a real story. A research  paper is not merely a collection of internet articles and book  citations you dug up and put down on paper, it is the way you weave all  of that into a story that convinces the reader that you know what the  story is and understand how improvement in future such situations can be  made.

Topic Choices:

1) Tuscaloosa, AL tornado – 2011 – This event may be a precursor of  things to come, since there is some evidence that “tornado alley” may be  shifting east.

2) Hurricane Michael – 2018 – The impact of this powerful storm is still being felt in Florida.

3)  California “Camp” Fire 2018 – There is a wealth of  information on this tragic incident and wildfires are becoming more  numerous and more intense.

4) New Madrid earthquake 1811 – While this event occurred in  the 1800’s, there is a big concern that we may be close to having  another event in this area. The threat is real enough that response  exercises have been held recently to prepare for another earthquake.

5) Mt. St. Helens Volcano eruption – 1980 While somewhat dated, a  similar event may happen in the future in the Cascade range of the U.S.

Score	Evaluation Criteria
Total score 100%	Meets all the criteria necessary for an A+ grade. Well formatted and instructions sufficiently followed. Well punctuated and grammar checked.
Above 90%	Ensures that all sections have been covered well, correct grammar, proofreads the work, answers all parts comprehensively, attentive to passive and active voice, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness, plagiarism-free
Above 75%	Meets most of the sections but has not checked for plagiarism. Partially meets the professor’s instructions, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 60%	Has not checked for plagiarism and has not proofread the project well. Out of context, can be cited for plagiarism and grammar mistakes and not correctly punctuated, fails to adhere to the professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 45%	Instructions are not well articulated. Has plenty of grammar mistakes and does not meet the quality standards needed. Needs to be revised. Not well punctuated
Less than 40%	Poor quality work that requires work that requires to be revised entirely. Does not meet appropriate quality standards and cannot be submitted as it is to the professor for marking. Definition of a failed grade
Alternative url	www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow/www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow/

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

The post Environmental Science Hurricane Michael Disaster Management Paper appeared first on Perfect Grade.

FIU National Disaster Recovery Framework Essay

FEMA – National Disaster Recovery Framework

Discussion-Essay Style Assignment Questions:

Describe the overall purpose of the National Disaster Recovery Framework (FEMA), including the Core Principles, Capabilities and Process essential for all communities to manage and improve recovery more effectively following an incident of any size or scale. Describe the whole community of stakeholders, including their roles and responsibilities during the recovery phase of the disaster. Describe the relevant Statutory and Executive order and Authority primarily used during the disaster recovery phase.

Instructions:

Material and research must be derived from the reading material provided (text and supplemental documents). This assignment must count with a minimum of 2400 words of writing content in length (not counting the words from the cover page, nor the words used for the reference page at the end). In addition, this is an APA style essay / assignment – Times New Roman, 12 font size, with 1” margins using line spacing of 1.5” with an APA citation approach. Be concise and get right to the point but be comprehensive and detailed. Cite the source whenever using an idea borrowed from the text (author, year, page #). At all times, credit must be given to the original author.

Score	Evaluation Criteria
Total score 100%	Meets all the criteria necessary for an A+ grade. Well formatted and instructions sufficiently followed. Well punctuated and grammar checked.
Above 90%	Ensures that all sections have been covered well, correct grammar, proofreads the work, answers all parts comprehensively, attentive to passive and active voice, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness, plagiarism-free
Above 75%	Meets most of the sections but has not checked for plagiarism. Partially meets the professor’s instructions, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 60%	Has not checked for plagiarism and has not proofread the project well. Out of context, can be cited for plagiarism and grammar mistakes and not correctly punctuated, fails to adhere to the professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 45%	Instructions are not well articulated. Has plenty of grammar mistakes and does not meet the quality standards needed. Needs to be revised. Not well punctuated
Less than 40%	Poor quality work that requires work that requires to be revised entirely. Does not meet appropriate quality standards and cannot be submitted as it is to the professor for marking. Definition of a failed grade
Alternative url	www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow/www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow/

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

The post FIU National Disaster Recovery Framework Essay appeared first on Perfect Grade.

FIU Environmental Science Federal Disaster Declaration Discussion

Federal Disaster Declaration

Name and describe the different types of disaster declarations and the requirements that must be met. Also, discuss the declaration process, from the initial impact of the disaster up to the federal government designating the disaster a Presidential Disaster Declaration. Finally, describe the available assistance under each of the different types of the disaster.

Material and research must be derived from the reading material (textbook and provided supplemental documents). This assignment must meet a minimum of 2450 words (not counting title and reference page), in an APA Essay Style Format using – Times New Roman, 12 font size, with 1’’ margins using line spacing of 1.5’’ (APA style citation). Cite the source whenever using a borrowed idea from the text (author, year, page #).

Textbook: McEntire, David A. (2015). Disaster Response and Recovery: Strategies and Tactics for Resilience, 2^nd Edition.

Supplemental Documents (all free electronic formats):

1. Robert T Stafford Act Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance
2. National Response Framework, 4th Edition
3. National Disaster Recovery Framework
4. Planning Considerations for Disaster Housing
5. 2017 Hurricane Season FEMA After-Action Report

Score	Evaluation Criteria
Total score 100%	Meets all the criteria necessary for an A+ grade. Well formatted and instructions sufficiently followed. Well punctuated and grammar checked.
Above 90%	Ensures that all sections have been covered well, correct grammar, proofreads the work, answers all parts comprehensively, attentive to passive and active voice, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness, plagiarism-free
Above 75%	Meets most of the sections but has not checked for plagiarism. Partially meets the professor’s instructions, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 60%	Has not checked for plagiarism and has not proofread the project well. Out of context, can be cited for plagiarism and grammar mistakes and not correctly punctuated, fails to adhere to the professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 45%	Instructions are not well articulated. Has plenty of grammar mistakes and does not meet the quality standards needed. Needs to be revised. Not well punctuated
Less than 40%	Poor quality work that requires work that requires to be revised entirely. Does not meet appropriate quality standards and cannot be submitted as it is to the professor for marking. Definition of a failed grade
Alternative url	www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow/www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow/

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

The post FIU Environmental Science Federal Disaster Declaration Discussion appeared first on Perfect Grade.

IU Environmental Science Disaster Management Coordination Efforts Essay

Review a specific disaster Situation Report, Flash Report, Emergency Action Plan, and/or other related report and identify any coordination efforts, including the use of OSOCC Coordination (On-Site Operations Coordination Centre), USAR (Urban Search and Rescue) Coordination, Civil-Military Coordination, NGO (Non-Governmental Organization) Coordination etc.

Once you have identified at least three separate coordination efforts that were utilized within this specific disaster, describe how these coordination efforts may have been effective in either speeding up the response and/or recovery efforts, reducing human suffering, or reducing the overall financial cost of the response.

Rubrics for this assignment:

The essay should count with at least 1200 words (not counting words from the cover page at the beginning or the reference page at the end); Times New Roman, 12-font size, with 1” margins and 1.5″ line spacing and using APA style and citation guidelines. Be concise and get right to the point but be comprehensive and detailed. Cite the source whenever using an idea that you borrowed from the text (author, year, page #).

Reading material sources for this assignment:

• Sphere Handbook (Core Humanitarian Standards)
• UNDAC Handbook (Coordination)

Score	Evaluation Criteria
Total score 100%	Meets all the criteria necessary for an A+ grade. Well formatted and instructions sufficiently followed. Well punctuated and grammar checked.
Above 90%	Ensures that all sections have been covered well, correct grammar, proofreads the work, answers all parts comprehensively, attentive to passive and active voice, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness, plagiarism-free
Above 75%	Meets most of the sections but has not checked for plagiarism. Partially meets the professor’s instructions, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 60%	Has not checked for plagiarism and has not proofread the project well. Out of context, can be cited for plagiarism and grammar mistakes and not correctly punctuated, fails to adhere to the professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 45%	Instructions are not well articulated. Has plenty of grammar mistakes and does not meet the quality standards needed. Needs to be revised. Not well punctuated
Less than 40%	Poor quality work that requires work that requires to be revised entirely. Does not meet appropriate quality standards and cannot be submitted as it is to the professor for marking. Definition of a failed grade
Alternative url	www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow/www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow/

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

The post IU Environmental Science Disaster Management Coordination Efforts Essay appeared first on Perfect Grade.

School Disaster Crisis Management Plan Assignment

For your Final Project, you are asked to use theories, strategies, and concepts from the course to develop a crisis management plan for your community.

Your Final Project must be presented as a 12–15 page (not including references, title page, or abstract), double-spaced, APA-formatted project in the form of a paper.

Crisis Management Plan Guidelines

The Final Project must include the following:

A strategy for identifying and selecting a crisis management team

A description of the organizational resources available to you in a crisis (community, state, national, and international organizations). Explain what they are and how they might be used in a crisis in your community. Then explain how you might promote or expect collaboration between and among them.

A description of the trained professionals available in your community

A summary of ethical and legal issues/considerations that you might encounter when responding to a crisis in your community

A description of issues/considerations related to diverse populations that you might encounter when responding to a crisis in your community

A description of a model that you would use to train counselors for a crisis

A description of how you would use empirically-supported treatments with survivors and care takers

A description of how the crisis management plan would be evaluated (after the fact)

Score	Evaluation Criteria
Total score 100%	Meets all the criteria necessary for an A+ grade. Well formatted and instructions sufficiently followed. Well punctuated and grammar checked.
Above 90%	Ensures that all sections have been covered well, correct grammar, proofreads the work, answers all parts comprehensively, attentive to passive and active voice, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness, plagiarism-free
Above 75%	Meets most of the sections but has not checked for plagiarism. Partially meets the professor’s instructions, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 60%	Has not checked for plagiarism and has not proofread the project well. Out of context, can be cited for plagiarism and grammar mistakes and not correctly punctuated, fails to adhere to the professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 45%	Instructions are not well articulated. Has plenty of grammar mistakes and does not meet the quality standards needed. Needs to be revised. Not well punctuated
Less than 40%	Poor quality work that requires work that requires to be revised entirely. Does not meet appropriate quality standards and cannot be submitted as it is to the professor for marking. Definition of a failed grade
Alternative url	www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow/www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow/

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

The post School Disaster Crisis Management Plan Assignment appeared first on Perfect Grade.

Hazardous Materials and Industrial Safety in Disaster Case Study

1. View the attached powerpoint case study. In the last 2 slides, answer the question 5-7 (keep 1-4 out. My friend do it). Keep them separate. an answer for each question.
2. Research and review the “Whole Community” Planning principles. Extend your research into week 9 describing the purpose and goal of this planning method. List 3 considerations that you would now include in your preparation for response (think globally as an expanding event).

Helpful Readings:

– Stilp, R. and Bevelacqua, A.; Emergency Medical Response to Hazardous Material Incidents, ISBN-10: 0-8273-7829-7 DELMAR CENGAGE Learning. (Chapters 7, 9, and 11).

– Noll, Hilderbrand, and Yvossa Hazardous material: Managing the incident 4th ed. (chapters 8).

– Cashman; Emergency Response Handbook for Chemical and Biological Agents and Weapons, second edition, ISBN 978-1-4200-5265-7 (CRC Press). (Chapters 3, 4, 5, 6, and 15).

– Research and review Project Bio-Shield.

Score	Evaluation Criteria
Total score 100%	Meets all the criteria necessary for an A+ grade. Well formatted and instructions sufficiently followed. Well punctuated and grammar checked.
Above 90%	Ensures that all sections have been covered well, correct grammar, proofreads the work, answers all parts comprehensively, attentive to passive and active voice, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness, plagiarism-free
Above 75%	Meets most of the sections but has not checked for plagiarism. Partially meets the professor’s instructions, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 60%	Has not checked for plagiarism and has not proofread the project well. Out of context, can be cited for plagiarism and grammar mistakes and not correctly punctuated, fails to adhere to the professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 45%	Instructions are not well articulated. Has plenty of grammar mistakes and does not meet the quality standards needed. Needs to be revised. Not well punctuated
Less than 40%	Poor quality work that requires work that requires to be revised entirely. Does not meet appropriate quality standards and cannot be submitted as it is to the professor for marking. Definition of a failed grade
Alternative url	www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow/www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow/

Hazardous Materials and Industrial Safety in Disaster Case Study

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

The post Hazardous Materials and Industrial Safety in Disaster Case Study appeared first on Perfect Grade.

Disaster Mental Health Discussion Assignment Paper

Disaster Mental Health Discussion Assignment Paper
POST1-
This book is a great tool that gives people a great deal of optimism. Ripley (2009), makes me
know how different I can react in cases of any danger or death. The book makes me understand
what makes a difference when one is between the matter of death and life. The most surprising
thing with the book is the wisdom that the author has demonstrated on humanity. She exhibits a
lot of elegance of her brains and resolves to solve the inadequacy of most of the revolutionary
responses. The most comforting and fascinating thing is her discovery on the ability of the brain
to perform the best with just minimal help.
There are a lot of things in the book that I have read and can influence me in what I do both in
the present the future. For instance, bearing in mind that we live in a world confronted with
unexpected natural calamities and crimes, as Ripley (2009) puts it, I am always in suspense
over what I can do if, by chance, I am faced with any of such. The book makes me understand
that if such happens, there is always luck based on one’s thinking. Therefore, a positive thought
might lead me to do an action that saves me, while negative thinking can lead me to do an act
that kills me even before the disaster hits on me. After the reading, I understand that one’s
actions, if engulfed by fear, are more devastating. Therefore, I should try to avoid panic.
I have learned that, during an event of a disaster, people tend to act differently; some respond
to the disaster based on the fear within themselves, and others respond based on courage that
has always build within them. However, it is fascinating that one can act as a rescuer when in
the same, they are hit by the disaster. This is represented by the story of Zedeno and Robert
(Ripley, 2009). It is fascinating as one hopeless person who is determined to live can insert
hope one another, one who is exceptionally pessimistic.

If I could share one thing with either a peer or a friend, the one thing would be hope through
determination and optimism. I would always encourage such individuals to find hope as it is very
much important when one is confronted with a disaster that puts them in a matter of life and
death. I would tell them always to follow what their positive instincts tell them in such cases.
The Unthinkable makes me understand that positivity and help are very much paramount when
one is confronted with a disaster. Through the use of the past stories about the people who had
escaped the hazards, I am presented with a challenge to always have positivity in case I am
confronted with any disaster of the kind. I am fascinated by the fact that one can examine their
dark brain sides and get prepared in cases of any disaster. I would personally like to get my
brain examined to determine how it would be if I am any kind of disaster.
References
Ripley, A. (2009). The unthinkable: Who survives when disaster strikes and why. Harmony.
POST 2 –
The book reflects on how each person has a different response to the uncertainty of a possible
life and death situations. I enjoyed how Amanda Ripley dissects each probable reason from
psychological studies; an individual can be calm and confident; meanwhile, others may display
anxiety and hesitation when a disaster occurs. Is it through genetics, training, or traumatic
experience that resulted in becoming competent or hopeless? It is still a mystery of what the
reasons why individuals have created these skills and traits. One validation from the book, I
agree, was how to overcome fear by developing yourself physically and mentally through
training of becoming resilient. According to Ripley (2007), three areas tend to be characterized
in this skill “a belief that they can influence life events, find meaningful purpose in life’s turmoil,
and a conviction that they can learn from both positive and negative experiences” (p. 91).
Tommy Walker, a firefighter in Kansas City, Missouri, presented a great example of how a
crowd can cause more complications while panicking. Walker and other people inside the
restaurant heard an explosion underneath the basement, in which the crowd was frightened and
quickly escaped to the front entrance. As the crowd stampede through the front entrance,
Walker was calm and collective to examine his situational awareness. He noticed no visuals of
smoke, fire, or threat, and remained at his table eating pizza. Once the restaurant was empty,
Walker walked outside, finding an ambulance arrived on the scene, treating the crowd with
minor injuries who panic. I can relate to Walker’s experience, where most of my responses are
hazmat calls. It takes time to respond, protect, identify safely, and execute an incident action
plan.
I learned a common reaction called paralysis, where an individual tends to freeze and feel
impervious to pain when a significant event happens (Ripley, 2008). For instance, when the
Virginia Tech shooting occurred, one student saw the gun come into the classroom’s doorway.
The student froze during this time and delayed him to duck underneath the desk. It was difficult
for the student wanting to escape but hindered his plan while the shooter was approaching the
classroom. According to Gallup, paralysis has become a typical response during a life and
death situation (Ripley, 2008). Individuals become overstimulated of all kinds of information,
which creates a slow reaction to perform any task during critical events properly.

I would share with my peers or friends is to remain calm and collective. Panic is a virus that
quickly spreads and consumes a person’s level of stress to become ineffective in performing a
task. Therefore, a solution is to prepare and plan for any event to protect our loved ones.
Ripely, A. (2008). The unthinkable: Who survives when disaster strikes – and why. Three Rivers
Press
POST3-
1.Reflect on this book and how it impacted you. What was surprising? What was confirming?
In the book, The Unthinkable the author, Amanda Ripley (2009), interviewed many people in a
bid to explain how people respond and react to disasters. She concludes that most people
follow three phases as follows. First, they deny that anything could be wrong. Second, they
deliberate on the presenting options. Finally, they make decisions on what to do as well as what
not to do. The findings presented by the author were surprising. For instance, the first phase,
which is about denial, came as a surprise. How does a person deny a disaster when they can
see it right in front of them? It means that there is a rapid moment when a person’s brain does
not register and synthesize information in a normal way when a disaster happens.
2.Did anything you read influence you in the present or in terms of what you will do (or not do) in
the future?
Ripley (2009) states that all the victims start in the same place and go through the three stages.
Specifically, the denial phase, which usually takes the form of delay, can be fatal. The author
has shown how it led to fatal outcomes during 9/11 and also through the account of a man who
waited for Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans. Being able to quickly overcome the initial shock,
which leads to the denial phase, is highly essential. Overcoming the situation fast will allow me
to get into the deliberation phase faster
3.What did you learn about how people react in a disaster event? Did anything surprise or
fascinate you?
As learned from the book, people start in the same place and progress through three phases.
The author has shown that the denial phase is critical as it might expose a person to more
significant risks, especially in major disasters, such as hurricanes and terrorist attacks.
4.If you could share one thing with a loved one or peer, what would it be?
A loved one should understand the nature of the survival arc, which details how individuals
respond to a disaster. Telling them about the three phases is crucial since it will inform them
about how they should respond in the event of a disaster. It is worth sharing the accounts of the
people who made the wrong decisions and, in return, put themselves in the way of harm, such
as the man who waited for Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans.
Reference
Ripley, A. (2009). The Unthinkable: Who survives when disaster strikes – and why. New York,
NY: Crown Publishers.
Requirements:
1- write one response for each post at last 200 words

Score	Evaluation Criteria
Total score 100%	Meets all the criteria necessary for an A+ grade. Well formatted and instructions sufficiently followed. Well punctuated and grammar checked.
Above 90%	Ensures that all sections have been covered well, correct grammar, proofreads the work, answers all parts comprehensively, attentive to passive and active voice, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness, plagiarism-free
Above 75%	Meets most of the sections but has not checked for plagiarism. Partially meets the professor’s instructions, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 60%	Has not checked for plagiarism and has not proofread the project well. Out of context, can be cited for plagiarism and grammar mistakes and not correctly punctuated, fails to adhere to the professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 45%	Instructions are not well articulated. Has plenty of grammar mistakes and does not meet the quality standards needed. Needs to be revised. Not well punctuated
Less than 40%	Poor quality work that requires work that requires to be revised entirely. Does not meet appropriate quality standards and cannot be submitted as it is to the professor for marking. Definition of a failed grade
Alternative url	www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow/www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow/

Disaster Mental Health Discussion Assignment Paper

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

The post Disaster Mental Health Discussion Assignment Paper appeared first on Perfect Grade.

Disaster Mental Health Discussion Response Study Paper Assignment Help

Disaster Mental Health Discussion Response Study Paper Assignment Help

Post1- 

What act stuck out to you the most? Why?

The entire audio entails people who recount the devastating happenings that occurred in New Orleans following the Katrina Floods.  There are several things that have come to my mind after listening to that audio; agony, grief, and resilience. It is evident that the psychological scars still linger. Today, 15 years later, I feel and think that a number of these survivors continue to experience mental-health related problems following the storm. Most of them are people who need psychological support to reinstate their mental stability. The loss of sense of self and social network that accompany familiar surroundings and basic necessities lead to damaging psychological health complications.

What would you find the most challenging as someone involved in Emergency Management or as part of a Recovery team?

Looking at the entire story, there are numerous challenges that the people involved in the emergency response team encountered. First, I think the response to this disaster was challenging because the civilians within that state had embraced the culture of not assisting themselves. Coordination lacked within the local level. People lacked respect for the police who returned the same agitation to them. Looting was rampant.

Normally, in major natural disasters, until the local government gains control of the area, the federal government cannot intervene because they are not supposed to be the first responders. Therefore, the lack of civilian volunteers magnified the disaster therefore presenting a heavy and challenging task to the recovery team.

How might these experiences have been better prevented?

To curb such experiences, several measures could be put into play, and a civilian defense corps organization could work miraculously. This could be a group that can perform and organize civilian response in case of any disaster. A good example can be traced to Texas, where the civilian volunteers make up an army of assistance. Therefore, the government must start involving civilians in all of their disaster preparations plans because there will never be enough resources from the government to cover dangerous disasters.

What can we do to build more resilient communities BEFORE a disaster strikes, so the impact of such a disaster is lessened?

It should be noted that no single entity or sector has definitive responsibility for enhancing national resilience. Similarly, no definite federal agency has all of the responsibility or authority, all of the suitable sets of skills, or enough financial resources to tackle this escalating problem. However, I think that a vital responsibility for the mounting community lies with the residents. Guidance, input, and pledge from all levels of academia, state government, and from the private sector, and community-based and nongovernmental firms are required throughout the process of building a more resilient community.

In a nutshell, to build community resilience, a community should develop abilities in areas not limited to the active involvement of all community stakeholders in health event development and individual preparations, expansion of social networks, the formation of health-supporting to enhance both physical and psychological health of the community.

What must be done AFTER a disaster in this context to build community recovery and resilience?

A major way to start the post-disaster recovery planning procedure within the community is by hosting a forum.  Such forums grant a platform for local governments and organizations within the community to share available resources and important information to better organize the community to recover from a tragic disaster. Additionally, these forums allow the members of the community, health experts, and the technical experts to work jointly to integrate knowledge, experience, and values to help the affected community. Through this, establishment of strategies to effectively respond to the post-disaster psychological and physical health requirements of the members of the community and reconstructing plans for social and health systems can then be immediately activated.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

POST2- 

What act stuck out to you the most? Why?

The most act that stuck out to me is how some authorities fail to carry the duty of care to assist people in disasters. For example, the federal government’s role in supporting people in emergencies is crucial by rescuing people and providing shelter, food, and water to all the affected populations during disasters. Thus, the act stuck out to me is that when some authorities fail to provide buses, trucks, trains, and planes to evaluate victims by saying it is not their job (Glass, 2005). I am taking the Organizational Management and Communication course this semester, and I have learned that good leadership, particularly those working with organizations that respond to disasters, should not just think about their jobs and tasks. They should do their best to support the affected communities. This act stuck out to me because it shows how people compromise others’ safety during disasters simply because it is not their job.

What would you find the most challenging as someone involved in Emergency Management or as part of a Recovery team?

The most challenging thing that a person involved in Emergency Management or Recovery Team face is watching some victims suffer from the disaster’s impact. According to Denise Moore, it is heartbreaking to see victims suffering from dehydration, yet it is challenging to help them at that moment (Glass, 2005).

How might these experiences have been better prevented?

The best approaches to implement in preventing challenges faced by people working in disaster-affected areas are to equip them with all the necessary inputs that can assist the affected people. In that regard, the federal government and the state government need to collaborate to empower people working in the recovery team. For example, Denise Moore recalls how the victims of hurricanes shared food and water (Glass, 2005). Thus, the effects would have been prevented by allocating enough resources to cater for the victims. All the federal and state governments would have prevented these experiences by evaluating people when they received information about the disaster.

What can we do to build more resilient communities BEFORE a disaster strikes, so the impact of such a disaster is lessened?

The most important thing to do in developing more resilient communities before a disaster occurs is to detect and prevent disaster. Communities should not ignore warnings about a disaster to ensure adequate disaster management measures. Also, communities need to report any signs that may trigger a disaster.

What must be done AFTER a disaster in this context to build community recovery and resilience?

In most cases, a disaster causes deaths, injuries, and destruction of properties. Therefore, after a disaster, many people develop emotional distress and mental issues such as post-traumatic stress disorder and depression. In that regard, it should be done to provide medical support to the victims to ensure they recover from the trauma (Glass, 2005). It is also essential to compensate the victims to ensure they recover from financial losses. More importantly, it is crucial to evacuate the victims to new settlements until the disaster is adequately addressed.

Reference

Glass, I. (2005, September 9). After The Flood. This American Life Episode 296. Retrieved from https://www.thisamericanlife.org/296/after-the-flood (Links to an external site.).

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

POST 3 

1.What act stuck out to you the most? Why?

The thing that struck me most is the fact that people who had been displaced by the hurricanes could not be helped by the government which is supposed to protect them. The displaced people were living in deplorable conditions that the government through respective authorities would have resolved. It was wrong for the police and the national guard to turn away people on the bridge when they were; looking for a better place to stay. The police were shooting at the people and there were orders from the authorities for a shoot to kill on any person who crossed the bridge.

2.What would you find the most challenging as someone involved in Emergency Management or as part of a Recovery team?

The biggest problem in the management of such an incident is the dilemma that is presented by the authorities and the need for human help. Displaced persons needed help but the authorities could not allow the responders to get to the people. Bridging the gap between authorities and people needing humanitarian help ought to be driven by the overall goal to help humans. the coordination of all the required personnel in response to a disaster is of paramount importance and in this case, it was poorly done.

3.How might these experiences have been better prevented?

To prevent such experiences, there ought to be a coordination between the government authorities which include the police and the national guard and the responders to the humanitarian needs. The government authorities should have been involved in the response to the hurricanes by channeling the resources to evacuate people from the area when it before it worsened rather than blocking them from leaving the area as the situation continued to worsen.

4.What can we do to build more resilient communities BEFORE a disaster strikes so the impact of such a disaster is lessened?

To ensure that communities are resilient to such disasters, there is a need to ensure that the stakeholders in such a disaster are well-coordinated and perform prior grills and training on how to respond to such a disaster so that they can respond with ease and effectiveness. Educating people on what they can do when in such a problem to ensure that they can be able to get through. Another way is ensuring that there are enough resources in all situations such as responders, food, and water.

5.What must be done AFTER a disaster in this context to build community recovery and resilience?

Providing victims with basic needs such as food, water, and clothing. Another way is to support them to get jobs so that they can be able to resume their normal way of life. Providing victims with psychological support because they may suffer from trauma, hallucinations, and delusions is also important in re-establishing a disaster-destabilized community. Supporting the victims by giving them resources, finances or ways of making finances and integrating them into well-established societies or ones that have not been affected by the disaster can be a great way of re-building such a community.

Reference

Glass, I. (2005, September 9). After The Flood. This American Life Episode 296. Retrieved from

Score	Evaluation Criteria
Total score 100%	Meets all the criteria necessary for an A+ grade. Well formatted and instructions sufficiently followed. Well punctuated and grammar checked.
Above 90%	Ensures that all sections have been covered well, correct grammar, proofreads the work, answers all parts comprehensively, attentive to passive and active voice, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness, plagiarism-free
Above 75%	Meets most of the sections but has not checked for plagiarism. Partially meets the professor’s instructions, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 60%	Has not checked for plagiarism and has not proofread the project well. Out of context, can be cited for plagiarism and grammar mistakes and not correctly punctuated, fails to adhere to the professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 45%	Instructions are not well articulated. Has plenty of grammar mistakes and does not meet the quality standards needed. Needs to be revised. Not well punctuated
Less than 40%	Poor quality work that requires work that requires to be revised entirely. Does not meet appropriate quality standards and cannot be submitted as it is to the professor for marking. Definition of a failed grade
Alternative url	www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow/www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow/

Disaster Mental Health Discussion Response Study Paper Assignment Help

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

The post Disaster Mental Health Discussion Response Study Paper Assignment Help appeared first on Perfect Grade.