- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@perfectgrade.us
Value-Based Purchasing Presentation Assignment Help
Value-Based Purchasing Presentation Assignment Help
Value-Based Purchasing Presentation – Rubric
Collapse All
Value-Based Care
18 points
Criteria Description
Value-Based Care
- Excellent
18 points
The presentation explains value-based care in a substantial and thought-provoking manner.
- Good
16.56 points
The presentation explains value-based care in a substantial manner.
- Satisfactory
15.84 points
The presentation clearly explains value-based care.
- Less Than Satisfactory
14.4 points
The presentation vaguely explains value-based care.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
The presentation does not sufficiently explain value-based care.
Differences in Value-Based Care
18 points
Criteria Description
Differences in Value-Based Care
- Excellent
18 points
The presentation explains how value-based care differs from a fee-for-service or a capitated approach in a substantial and thought-provoking manner.
- Good
16.56 points
The presentation explains how value-based care differs from a fee-for-service or a capitated approach in a substantial manner.
- Satisfactory
15.84 points
The presentation clearly explains how value-based care differs from a fee-for-service or a capitated approach.
- Less Than Satisfactory
14.4 points
The presentation vaguely explains how value-based care differs from a fee-for-service or a capitated approach.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
The presentation does not sufficiently explain how value-based care differs from a fee-for-service or a capitated approach.
Financial Advantages to Value-Based Purchasing
18 points
Criteria Description
Financial Advantages to Value-Based Purchasing
- Excellent
18 points
The presentation thoroughly and substantially describes why adopting a value-based purchasing arrangement would be financially advantageous for the physician groups and to the health plan.
- Good
16.56 points
The presentation thoroughly describes why adopting a value-based purchasing arrangement would be financially advantageous for the physician groups and to the health plan.
- Satisfactory
15.84 points
The presentation clearly describes why adopting a value-based purchasing arrangement would be financially advantageous for the physician groups and to the health plan.
- Less Than Satisfactory
14.4 points
The presentation vaguely describes why adopting a value-based purchasing arrangement would be financially advantageous for the physician groups and to the health plan.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
The presentation does not sufficiently describe why adopting a value-based purchasing arrangement would be financially advantageous for the physician groups and to the health plan.
Presentation of Content
9 points
Criteria Description
Presentation of Content
- Excellent
9 points
The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
- Good
8.28 points
The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other.
- Satisfactory
7.92 points
The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources.
- Less Than Satisfactory
7.2 points
The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.
Layout
9 points
Criteria Description
Layout
- Excellent
9 points
The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.
- Good
8.28 points
The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.
- Satisfactory
7.92 points
The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.
- Less Than Satisfactory
7.2 points
The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.
Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)
9 points
Criteria Description
Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)
- Excellent
9 points
The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.
- Good
8.28 points
The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
- Satisfactory
7.92 points
Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.
- Less Than Satisfactory
7.2 points
Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
4.5 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
- Excellent
4.5 points
Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.
- Good
4.14 points
Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.
- Satisfactory
3.96 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader.
- Less Than Satisfactory
3.6 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.
Documentation of Sources
4.5 points
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
- Excellent
4.5 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
- Good
4.14 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
- Satisfactory
3.96 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
- Less Than Satisfactory
3.6 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not documented.
