Business Adapting to Disruptive Technology Case Study

Business Adapting to Disruptive Technology Case Study

In this module, we learned that everything is in a state of constant change. This is a challenge of strategic management, as the industry environment is driven by technology, consumer needs, politics, economic conditions, and many other influences. Consider these influences as you analyze the following case.

Case 11: New York Times: Adapting to the Digital Revolution p. 492 (in the textbook)

To support the case analysis read Chapter 8 and the assigned reading.

Remember that a case study is a puzzle to be solved, so before reading and answering the specific case questions, develop your proposed solution by following these five steps:

Read the case study to identify the key issues and underlying issues. These issues are the principles and concepts of the course module which apply to the situation described in the case study.

Record the facts from the case study which are relevant to the principles and concepts of the module. The case may have extraneous information not relevant to the current course module. Your ability to differentiate between relevant and irrelevant information is an important aspect of case analysis, as it will inform the focus of your answers.

Describe in some detail the actions that would address or correct the situation.

Consider how you would support your solution with examples from experience or current real-life examples or cases from textbooks.

Complete this initial analysis and then read the discussion questions. Typically, you will already have the answers to the questions but with a broader consideration. At this point, you can add the details and/or analytical tools required to solve the case.

Case Study Questions:

What was the nature and sources of organizational inertia in this case?

Explain “disruptive technology” and “architectural innovation” as it relates to this case.

Evaluate the role of organizational ambidexterity, crisis management, capability development, dynamic capabilities, and knowledge management in this case.

What general lessons for the management of strategic change did you gain from this case and how do they apply to the current state of this industry?

Score	Evaluation Criteria
Total score 100%	Meets all the criteria necessary for an A+ grade. Well formatted and instructions sufficiently followed. Well punctuated and grammar checked.
Above 90%	Ensures that all sections have been covered well, correct grammar, proofreads the work, answers all parts comprehensively, attentive to passive and active voice, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness, plagiarism-free
Above 75%	Meets most of the sections but has not checked for plagiarism. Partially meets the professor’s instructions, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 60%	Has not checked for plagiarism and has not proofread the project well. Out of context, can be cited for plagiarism and grammar mistakes and not correctly punctuated, fails to adhere to the professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 45%	Instructions are not well articulated. Has plenty of grammar mistakes and does not meet the quality standards needed. Needs to be revised. Not well punctuated
Less than 40%	Poor quality work that requires work that requires to be revised entirely. Does not meet appropriate quality standards and cannot be submitted as it is to the professor for marking. Definition of a failed grade
Alternative url	www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow/www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow/

Business Adapting to Disruptive Technology Case Study

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

The post Business Adapting to Disruptive Technology Case Study appeared first on Perfect Grade.

Managing Disruptive Behavior and Misbehavior in Classroom

Managing Disruptive Behavior and Misbehavior in Classroom

Disruptive behavior and misbehavior can occur in any classroom. If a teacher understands the needs of the student, the effect of the environment on the student, and identifies behavior patterns, it is easier to identify ways to provide support, reinforce positive behaviors, redirect behavior, and prevent a disruptive behavior from occurring in the future.

The use of PBIS and other research-based strategies can be used to address and manage behavior and can create a learning environment that is safe and encourages students to engage in meaningful learning and interaction.

Complete the “Classroom Management Matrix.” When conducting research and selecting example behaviors, focus on students in the grade band relevant to your field of study. Include causes and strategies for addressing misbehavior or disruptive behavior in the inclusive classroom. Complete both the chart and the narrative.

Support your findings with a minimum of three scholarly resources.

Classroom Management Matrix

Part 1: Classroom Management Strategies

Part 2: Narrative

Compose a 250-500-word narrative the addresses the following. Include real-world examples to illustrate your ideas.

In your own words, describe what inclusion is and what it means when working with students with disabilities.

Describe the connection between classroom management strategies and collaboration with students and colleagues in creating a safe, inclusive learning environment and preventing disruptive behavior in the inclusion classroom.

Explain how collaboration and the implementation of PBIS and other research-based strategies can be used to address and manage behavior and help to create a safe environment in which the students can engage in meaningful learning and social interactions.

References

Managing Disruptive Behavior and Misbehavior in Classroom

Score	Evaluation Criteria
Total score 100%	Meets all the criteria necessary for an A+ grade. Well formatted and instructions sufficiently followed. Well punctuated and grammar checked.
Above 90%	Ensures that all sections have been covered well, correct grammar, proofreads the work, answers all parts comprehensively, attentive to passive and active voice, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness, plagiarism-free
Above 75%	Meets most of the sections but has not checked for plagiarism. Partially meets the professor’s instructions, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 60%	Has not checked for plagiarism and has not proofread the project well. Out of context, can be cited for plagiarism and grammar mistakes and not correctly punctuated, fails to adhere to the professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 45%	Instructions are not well articulated. Has plenty of grammar mistakes and does not meet the quality standards needed. Needs to be revised. Not well punctuated
Less than 40%	Poor quality work that requires work that requires to be revised entirely. Does not meet appropriate quality standards and cannot be submitted as it is to the professor for marking. Definition of a failed grade
Alternative url	www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow/www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow/

Managing Disruptive Behavior and Misbehavior in Classroom

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

The post Managing Disruptive Behavior and Misbehavior in Classroom appeared first on Perfect Grade.