Practical Importance of The Social Dilemma Movie Email

https://scrapsfromtheloft.com/movies/the-social-di…

You can read transcript or watch on Netflix if you have

You are writing to your 13-year-old niece or nephew, or your friends. If you use technical terms, define them. Convince this person that the information in this movie is of practical importance to them.

Please summarize the movie.

Show that you watched the movie and took notes by selecting key points, and not peripheral points.

At least 3 main points and three paragraphs minimum (more if you would like, fewer if you are an excellent writer).

Provide specifics – detail, citations, examples. Demonstrate understanding.

Please provide your opinion.

Fourth paragraph

Reflect on how this might inform your and the life of the person you are writing to, personally

Discuss what you think the issues raised in this video say about the health of our social and business institutions.

Score	Evaluation Criteria
Total score 100%	Meets all the criteria necessary for an A+ grade. Well formatted and instructions sufficiently followed. Well punctuated and grammar checked.
Above 90%	Ensures that all sections have been covered well, correct grammar, proofreads the work, answers all parts comprehensively, attentive to passive and active voice, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness, plagiarism-free
Above 75%	Meets most of the sections but has not checked for plagiarism. Partially meets the professor’s instructions, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 60%	Has not checked for plagiarism and has not proofread the project well. Out of context, can be cited for plagiarism and grammar mistakes and not correctly punctuated, fails to adhere to the professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 45%	Instructions are not well articulated. Has plenty of grammar mistakes and does not meet the quality standards needed. Needs to be revised. Not well punctuated
Less than 40%	Poor quality work that requires work that requires to be revised entirely. Does not meet appropriate quality standards and cannot be submitted as it is to the professor for marking. Definition of a failed grade
Alternative url	www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow/www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow/

Practical Importance of The Social Dilemma Movie Email

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

The post Practical Importance of The Social Dilemma Movie Email appeared first on Perfect Grade.

Ethical Dilemma and Business Model Change Essay

For your utilitarian application, you are on the right track. You need to really think more about all of the people who will be affected by the short term and long term consequences. There are many people involved and affected by this. Also, I’d think through a more specific number than “10” for most people and their potential happiness/pain levels. You do not need to write more text/paragraphs, but need to significantly expand the list of people.

For utilitarianism, you have only a few categories. It’s not the numbers that I’m concerned about, it’s your ability to think through the consequences of doing something like what you’re proposing, you need to think much more expansively to add more categories of people who will be positively and negatively impacted by such a business model change.

when you make a change to the type of product you are making, then all that leads to the creation of a product changes. I’m trying not to answer the question for you. Think through things the way a business person would think through the business plan change.

Score	Evaluation Criteria
Total score 100%	Meets all the criteria necessary for an A+ grade. Well formatted and instructions sufficiently followed. Well punctuated and grammar checked.
Above 90%	Ensures that all sections have been covered well, correct grammar, proofreads the work, answers all parts comprehensively, attentive to passive and active voice, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness, plagiarism-free
Above 75%	Meets most of the sections but has not checked for plagiarism. Partially meets the professor’s instructions, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 60%	Has not checked for plagiarism and has not proofread the project well. Out of context, can be cited for plagiarism and grammar mistakes and not correctly punctuated, fails to adhere to the professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 45%	Instructions are not well articulated. Has plenty of grammar mistakes and does not meet the quality standards needed. Needs to be revised. Not well punctuated
Less than 40%	Poor quality work that requires work that requires to be revised entirely. Does not meet appropriate quality standards and cannot be submitted as it is to the professor for marking. Definition of a failed grade
Alternative url	www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow/www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow/

Ethical Dilemma and Business Model Change Essay

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

The post Ethical Dilemma and Business Model Change Essay appeared first on Perfect Grade.

9 Ethical Dilemma in Communication Discussion

Because interpersonal communication affects us and others, our interactions involve ethical choices. Describe a situation that involved an ethical choice and the communication practices that were used to address the issue. You can choose a personal experience or one that you know about.

Ethical issues could include whether or not to lie, withholding certain information from someone else, or passing on a message to a third party that was told in confidence. Explain the ethical situation was handled. (For example, did they avoid the decision at first? Did they engage in dual perspective to figure out why one person would want them to not tell others certain information, etc.?)

CCSD Summerdale Swim and Tennis Club Sales Case Discussion

FOURTH FORMAL LETTER ASSIGNMENT:

Sales Case

As a member of the management team of the Summerdale Swim and Tennis Club, you have just attended a strategizing session in which the team generated ideas for increasing memberships. Your boss presented data about current memberships broken down by demographic categories. One group that stood out for its low number of memberships was older adults. “We’re doing well attracting young adults with kids,” your boss says, “but we’re not attracting enough senior citizens. In fact, our data show that many members let their membership’s lapse once their kids reach their teenage years.” The team decides that one strategy to remedy this problem will be to send a letter to those aged 50 and over who have let their club membership lapse. You have been assigned the task of creating this mailing.

This problem can give you excellent practice turning product features into reader benefits.

The first step is to visit swim and tennis club websites (just a few) and thoroughly study all their features. Here’s a partial list:

•         Exclusive access to high-quality facilities
•         Equipment provided
•         Year-round access
•         Free parking
•         Towels and lockers and changing rooms provided
•         Group and individual exercise and sports instruction classes available
•         Social activities and clubs (such as card games, hobbies, etc.)
•         Members-only access to event rooms
•         Convenient hours
•         Ability to reserve facilities for private events
•         Restricted access and regulations keep club atmosphere clean and courteous

Then, turn these features into benefits that would appeal to the target audience. You should come up with those like the following:

•         Can invest in your health and wellness
•         Can enjoy the company of peers
•         Can escape the routine and learn new activities
•         Can find a time that works for you
•         Can enjoy the club benefits year-round
•         Can have easy access to party facilities
•         Can support a well-run and positive community organization
•         Can easily entertain children and grandchildren

The first paragraph should build on a central selling point, such as the high-quality and private facilities provided to members: “Looking for an oasis of wellness in your busy week?” or “Want to stay active without fighting the crowds?” (Open with words that gain attention and setup the strategy.)

Paragraphs in the body of the message, should continue to build on the activities and benefits offered by the club by using the list created above. By the time the actual drive for the sale comes, readers should be convinced that the club is not just for those with young children. (Now, develop the strategy using persuasive language and the you-viewpoint.)

The closing paragraph could, for example, what new facility or equipment just been updated? Or is a special social event just around the corner? (Make the request clearly and without negatives– either at the end of the message or followed by words that continue the persuasive appeal.)

Of course, the message should end with a reminder of the benefits and perhaps include a fetching P.S.  (post-script)

Studying the websites of a few swim and tennis clubs and using realistic facts as well as your imagination, write the letter that will persuade these former members to rejoin. Consider carefully how to turn features of the club into benefits for your readers.

Score	Evaluation Criteria
Total score 100%	Meets all the criteria necessary for an A+ grade. Well formatted and instructions sufficiently followed. Well punctuated and grammar checked.
Above 90%	Ensures that all sections have been covered well, correct grammar, proofreads the work, answers all parts comprehensively, attentive to passive and active voice, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness, plagiarism-free
Above 75%	Meets most of the sections but has not checked for plagiarism. Partially meets the professor’s instructions, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 60%	Has not checked for plagiarism and has not proofread the project well. Out of context, can be cited for plagiarism and grammar mistakes and not correctly punctuated, fails to adhere to the professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 45%	Instructions are not well articulated. Has plenty of grammar mistakes and does not meet the quality standards needed. Needs to be revised. Not well punctuated
Less than 40%	Poor quality work that requires work that requires to be revised entirely. Does not meet appropriate quality standards and cannot be submitted as it is to the professor for marking. Definition of a failed grade
Alternative url	www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow/www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow/

9 Ethical Dilemma in Communication Discussion

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

The post 9 Ethical Dilemma in Communication Discussion appeared first on Perfect Grade.

The Ethical Dilemma
A lawsuit a few years ago made headlines worldwide when a
McDonald’s drive-through customer spilled a cup of scalding
hot coffee on herself. Claiming the coffee was too hot to
be safely consumed in a car, the badly burned 80-year-old
woman won $2.9 million in court. (The judge later reduced
the award to $640,000.) McDonald’s claimed the product
was served to the correct specifications and was of proper
quality. Further, the cup read “Caution—Contents May
Be Hot.” McDonald’s coffee, at 180º, is substantially hotter
(by corporate rule) than typical restaurant coffee, despite
hundreds of coffee-scalding complaints in the past 10 years.
Similar court cases, incidentally, resulted in smaller verdicts,

but again in favor of the plaintiffs. For example, Motor City
Bagel Shop was sued for a spilled cup of coffee by a drivethrough
patron, and Starbucks by a customer who spilled
coffee on her own ankle.
Are McDonald’s, Motor City, and Starbucks at fault in
situations such as these? How do quality and ethics enter into

these cases?

How can this issue be addressed from a Christian worldview? What guidance from a
Biblical perspective could be apllied to understand and possibly resolve the dilemma?
Paper should include 6 external citations.

Score	Evaluation Criteria
Total score 100%	Meets all the criteria necessary for an A+ grade. Well formatted and instructions sufficiently followed. Well punctuated and grammar checked.
Above 90%	Ensures that all sections have been covered well, correct grammar, proofreads the work, answers all parts comprehensively, attentive to passive and active voice, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness, plagiarism-free
Above 75%	Meets most of the sections but has not checked for plagiarism. Partially meets the professor’s instructions, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 60%	Has not checked for plagiarism and has not proofread the project well. Out of context, can be cited for plagiarism and grammar mistakes and not correctly punctuated, fails to adhere to the professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 45%	Instructions are not well articulated. Has plenty of grammar mistakes and does not meet the quality standards needed. Needs to be revised. Not well punctuated
Less than 40%	Poor quality work that requires work that requires to be revised entirely. Does not meet appropriate quality standards and cannot be submitted as it is to the professor for marking. Definition of a failed grade
Alternative url	www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow/www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow/

The Ethical Dilemma

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

The post The Ethical Dilemma appeared first on Perfect Grade.

Revisiting your Ethical Dilemma Discussion Study Paper Assignment Help

Revisiting your Ethical Dilemma Discussion Study Paper Assignment Help

Part I: Revisiting your Ethical Dilemma

In your opinion.

Let’s revisit the example you shared in our first discussion about an ethical dilemma or situation that you’ve faced. Describe this example and present your reasoning for your response using the ethical principles and theories that we’ve learned in the course. How did you respond differently? How did you respond similarly?

My ethical dilemma I shared:

I had once experienced an ethical dilemma when I was watching a given movie. In the film, a patient went testing for HIV in Saint George hospital. The doctor who performed the test on the patient realized that the patient had been exposed to HIV. Instead of telling the patient the truth, the doctor gave negative results to the patient to protect him from the truth about his condition. The doctor did not adhere to the ethical principle of truthfulness. Even if the patient’s results were painful, it was his right to receive correct results. The doctor, from his perspective, was that the patient would be traumatized and commit suicide. This was an ethical dilemma for the doctor since he was trying to protect his patient, but in doing that he was violating the principle of truthfulness.

Another ethical dilemma that I saw in the movie was concerning a teenager who visited the hospital because of a certain problem she experienced in her genitals. The doctor found out that the girl had been infected with a sexually transmitted disease, which required immediate attention. Since the child was a minor, living under the roof of her parents, her mother wanted to know what was wrong. The doctor was faced with an ethical dilemma of whether to disclose the information to her mother or not. The ethical principle of confidentiality was supposed to be considered by the doctor. Doctors are not supposed to disclose information concerning the patients without their consent as stated by Kälvemark et al. (2004). The doctor had no option but to violate the principle since his best option was to reveal the information to her parents, which he thought was the right decision.

In the same movie, another patient had experienced a road accident, and his leg was severely injured by sharp metal. To reduce the spread of infection, the doctors decided that they should amputate the leg. The doctors talked to the patient about the process of amputation, but the patient declined. The doctors were faced with an ethical dilemma of whether to accept the patient’s decision or to amputate the leg since the infection was going to spread on the whole body and kill the patient. The ethical principle of Autonomy had to be adhered to by the doctors. The doctors had to respect the patient’s decision even though it was a wrong decision, which could lead to his death.

The ethical dilemma faced in Terry Schiavo’s case was whether to let her die or live by removing the feeding tube. Terry Schiavo will be to remove the feeding tube, but this was faced with different obstructions. It was difficult for her family to accept the decisions since, in doing so, she was going to pass on. It was also not fair not to respect the choice of Terry Schiavo hence an ethical dilemma in the situation.

The stakeholders in this topic were one her family who wanted Terry Schiavo to live. Her husband was also another stakeholder. He wanted the best for his wife, and he followed her will by removing the feeding tube. The community at large also wanted Terry Schiavo to live. They did not accept the decision to remove the feeding tube. Courts were also major stakeholders who carried proceedings on the case. Terry Schiavo’s case was had 20 times in courts, which makes the courts a significant participant. The national government was also involved in the matter. Congress even had a voting session to decide the fate of Terry’s case. The media was also involved in the case. The media ensured that all people across the country were aware of the event that was affecting Terry. The media led people to rally to protect Terry so that she might live.

The ethical principle of Justice applies in Terry’s case. This principle entails fairness and equality to all as stated by Gelling (1999). Terry was equal to any other human being, and it was her right to live like any other person. Hence the feeding tube was not removed because she also had a right to live despite her condition. Another ethical principle is the principle of Autonomy. Autonomy is whereby an individual is allowed to make his or her own decisions as stated by Scott (2017). From the case, Terry’s decision to remove the feeding tube was adhered to. Even though it was returned back, we see that at long last, it was removed according to her wishes.

My recommendation towards the case would be to allow the will of Terry to pass. All those cases were irrelevant since Terry had made up her decision. Yes, my response differs from the outcomes in the case since the parents were in denial, but I believe Terry had suffered a lot and wanted to be at peace. So the best option was to allow the principle of Autonomy to take place so that she might rest in peace.)

PART II: ANALYSIS OF AN ETHICAL ISSUE

Apply what you know.

Our topics in this week’s readings are often viewed as controversial, emotionally rooted, and rife with ethical issues. Choose one of the following topics, one which you have strong feelings about:

Euthanasia

Assisted reproduction

Stem cell research

Next, respond to the following questions:

What is the ethical dilemma(s) inherent in the topic chosen?

Which ethical principles and theories might apply? Be sure to identify and define each principle or theory.

Using the ethical principles and theories you’ve identified, apply these to support an ethical decision in two ways. First, select a decision which you would not personally agree with. Next, select a decision which is consistent with your personal beliefs.

How would you assist the patient with decision-making on your chosen topic? Be sure to describe the ethical decision-making process.

How might personal values influence the behavior of the healthcare professional? How would you guard against having your personal values influence your behavior?

Score	Evaluation Criteria
Total score 100%	Meets all the criteria necessary for an A+ grade. Well formatted and instructions sufficiently followed. Well punctuated and grammar checked.
Above 90%	Ensures that all sections have been covered well, correct grammar, proofreads the work, answers all parts comprehensively, attentive to passive and active voice, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness, plagiarism-free
Above 75%	Meets most of the sections but has not checked for plagiarism. Partially meets the professor’s instructions, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 60%	Has not checked for plagiarism and has not proofread the project well. Out of context, can be cited for plagiarism and grammar mistakes and not correctly punctuated, fails to adhere to the professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 45%	Instructions are not well articulated. Has plenty of grammar mistakes and does not meet the quality standards needed. Needs to be revised. Not well punctuated
Less than 40%	Poor quality work that requires work that requires to be revised entirely. Does not meet appropriate quality standards and cannot be submitted as it is to the professor for marking. Definition of a failed grade
Alternative url	www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow/www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow/

Revisiting your Ethical Dilemma Discussion Study Paper Assignment Help

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

The post Revisiting your Ethical Dilemma Discussion Study Paper Assignment Help appeared first on Perfect Grade.

AMC Ethical Dilemma on Pharmaceutical Company Discussion Assignment Help

AMC Ethical Dilemma on Pharmaceutical Company Discussion Assignment Help

Read the situation below. Post your own opinion and response to the question on the discussion board. Individual participation should be entered by Sunday 05/03, so you all have the weekend to discuss the different opinions and get to a conclusion on whether Dr. Johnson should break confidentiality and reveal the process? The group, as a group, has to make a decision and announce the final position on a post.

TO get full credit for this assignment:

You should submit an initial contribution with your own analysis and opinion.

Once you can see other students opinions, you should contribute to the conversation and work with your group to make a final decision

A final group decision must be clearly expressed and submitted before the deadline.

Here is the situation:

Dr. Howard Johnson is a tenured Associate Professor in the biochemistry department at a public university. He has been collaborating with a large, multinational pharmaceutical firm for the past six years. During this time the company has supported his research to the extent that they are the sole source of his funding. The research is widely respected and he receives multiple requests each year for seminars, review articles, etc. He anticipates that his promotion credentials for Full Professor will be forwarded to the University Committee in two to three years. As part of his research program with the company, he serves as an “external reviewer” in the annual evaluation of the Research and Development section of the corporation. In doing so, he signs a confidentiality agreement that covers the research activities discussed during the review.

This year Dr. Johnson was inadvertently included in a discussion at the social gathering following the review where one of the corporate scientists revealed that they had been utilizing a widely recognized chemical synthesis to generate new compounds that could be used as antidotes to certain viral infections. Because of prior use and the obvious nature of the synthesis as presented in the literature, neither the process nor the compounds could be patented. Thus, as soon as word of this process leaks out, it would be available to any of their competitors.

During the course of this conversation, he learned that in secret trials one of the compounds reduced the mortality of Rift Valley Fever by 90%. About 5000 lives are lost annually to this and similar viruses in East African countries.

The strategic plan adopted by the company was to withhold the distribution of those compounds. Management decided that they could not afford to release this compound to a developing country which would amount to a purely philanthropic gesture until after they had time to develop the compounds for influenza and the common cold. This would require about five years to obtain all of the permits needed to market such an antidote in developed countries. Unless the market in developed countries could be reached the antidotes would not be economically feasible t

Score	Evaluation Criteria
Total score 100%	Meets all the criteria necessary for an A+ grade. Well formatted and instructions sufficiently followed. Well punctuated and grammar checked.
Above 90%	Ensures that all sections have been covered well, correct grammar, proofreads the work, answers all parts comprehensively, attentive to passive and active voice, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness, plagiarism-free
Above 75%	Meets most of the sections but has not checked for plagiarism. Partially meets the professor’s instructions, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 60%	Has not checked for plagiarism and has not proofread the project well. Out of context, can be cited for plagiarism and grammar mistakes and not correctly punctuated, fails to adhere to the professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 45%	Instructions are not well articulated. Has plenty of grammar mistakes and does not meet the quality standards needed. Needs to be revised. Not well punctuated
Less than 40%	Poor quality work that requires work that requires to be revised entirely. Does not meet appropriate quality standards and cannot be submitted as it is to the professor for marking. Definition of a failed grade
Alternative url	www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow/www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow/

AMC Ethical Dilemma on Pharmaceutical Company Discussion Assignment Help

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

The post AMC Ethical Dilemma on Pharmaceutical Company Discussion Assignment Help appeared first on Perfect Grade.

CC Ethical Dilemma Discussion Assignment Help

CC Ethical Dilemma Discussion Assignment Help

Here is the situation:

Dr. Howard Johnson is a tenured Associate Professor in the biochemistry department at a public university. He has been collaborating with a large, multinational pharmaceutical firm for the past six years. During this time the company has supported his research to the extent that they are the sole source of his funding. The research is widely respected and he receives multiple requests each year for seminars, review articles, etc. He anticipates that his promotion credentials for Full Professor will be forwarded to the University Committee in two to three years. As part of his research program with the company, he serves as an “external reviewer” in the annual evaluation of the Research and Development section of the corporation. In doing so, he signs a confidentiality agreement that covers the research activities discussed during the review.

This year Dr. Johnson was inadvertently included in a discussion at the social gathering following the review where one of the corporate scientists revealed that they had been utilizing a widely recognized chemical synthesis to generate new compounds that could be used as antidotes to certain viral infections. Because of prior use and the obvious nature of the synthesis as presented in the literature, neither the process nor the compounds could be patented. Thus, as soon as word of this process leaks out, it would be available to any of their competitors.

During the course of this conversation, he learned that in secret trials one of the compounds reduced the mortality of Rift Valley Fever by 90%. About 5000 lives are lost annually to this and similar viruses in East African countries.

The strategic plan adopted by the company was to withhold the distribution of those compounds. Management decided that they could not afford to release this compound to a developing country which would amount to a purely philanthropic gesture until after they had time to develop the compounds for influenza and the common cold. This would require about five years to obtain all of the permits needed to market such an antidote in developed countries. Unless the market in developed countries could be reached the antidotes would not be economically feasible to develop. However, if developed tens of thousands of additional lives lost to influenza would be saved.

Score	Evaluation Criteria
Total score 100%	Meets all the criteria necessary for an A+ grade. Well formatted and instructions sufficiently followed. Well punctuated and grammar checked.
Above 90%	Ensures that all sections have been covered well, correct grammar, proofreads the work, answers all parts comprehensively, attentive to passive and active voice, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness, plagiarism-free
Above 75%	Meets most of the sections but has not checked for plagiarism. Partially meets the professor’s instructions, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 60%	Has not checked for plagiarism and has not proofread the project well. Out of context, can be cited for plagiarism and grammar mistakes and not correctly punctuated, fails to adhere to the professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 45%	Instructions are not well articulated. Has plenty of grammar mistakes and does not meet the quality standards needed. Needs to be revised. Not well punctuated
Less than 40%	Poor quality work that requires work that requires to be revised entirely. Does not meet appropriate quality standards and cannot be submitted as it is to the professor for marking. Definition of a failed grade
Alternative url	www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow/www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow/

CC Ethical Dilemma Discussion Assignment Help

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

The post CC Ethical Dilemma Discussion Assignment Help appeared first on Perfect Grade.

Facebook Social Networking Platform Ethical Dilemma Paper Assignment Help

Facebook Social Networking Platform Ethical Dilemma Paper Assignment Help

Your paper should include, but is not limited to:

1. a) A factual summary of the ethical dilemma that the organization experienced;
2. b) the organization’s reaction to this dilemma;
3. c) how the organization’s reaction to the situation affected each of the major stakeholders in this situation. Include each stakeholder’s position in this case and their reaction;
4. d) your opinion as to whether the organization responded in the most ethical manner possible;
5. e) several alternative responses that the organization could have taken and the probable consequences of each;
6. f) describe how the relationship between the organization and its stakeholders changed after this incident, if at all; etc.

) You must cite your work but may choose any method that you wish.

Grading Rubric

A factual summary of the ethical dilemma that the organization experienced; (15pts.)

The organization’s reaction to this dilemma; (15pts.)

How the organization’s reaction to the situation affected each of the major stakeholders in this situation. Include each stakeholder’s position in this case and their reaction; (20pts.)

Your opinion as to whether the organization responded in the most ethical manner possible; (15pts.)

Several alternative responses that the organization could have taken and the probable consequences of each; (20pts.)

Describe how the relationship between the organization and its stakeholders changed after this incident, if at all; (15pts.)

Description of all relevant facts in the case.

Identification and explanation of the ethical dilemma.

Organized / Well-written / Coherent

Comprehensive explanation of the organization’s reaction to the dilemma.

Organized / Well-written / Coherent

Description of the effect of the organization’s reaction on each major stakeholder.

All major stakeholders addressed.

Each stakeholder’s position in the case.

Each stakeholder’s reaction to the organization’s reaction.

Organized / Well-written / Coherent

Well justified opinion regarding whether the organization’s response was the most ethical or not, and why.

Organized / Well-written / Coherent

Identification and explanation of all reasonable alternative responses that the organization could have taken.

Probable consequences (comprehensive) of each alternative response.

Organized / Well-written / Coherent

Explanation of the change in the relationship between the organization and the stakeholders due to the incident.

Each stakeholder addressed.

Organized / Well-written / Coherent

Score	Evaluation Criteria
Total score 100%	Meets all the criteria necessary for an A+ grade. Well formatted and instructions sufficiently followed. Well punctuated and grammar checked.
Above 90%	Ensures that all sections have been covered well, correct grammar, proofreads the work, answers all parts comprehensively, attentive to passive and active voice, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness, plagiarism-free
Above 75%	Meets most of the sections but has not checked for plagiarism. Partially meets the professor’s instructions, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 60%	Has not checked for plagiarism and has not proofread the project well. Out of context, can be cited for plagiarism and grammar mistakes and not correctly punctuated, fails to adhere to the professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 45%	Instructions are not well articulated. Has plenty of grammar mistakes and does not meet the quality standards needed. Needs to be revised. Not well punctuated
Less than 40%	Poor quality work that requires work that requires to be revised entirely. Does not meet appropriate quality standards and cannot be submitted as it is to the professor for marking. Definition of a failed grade
Alternative url	www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow/www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow/

Facebook Social Networking Platform Ethical Dilemma Paper Assignment Help

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

The post Facebook Social Networking Platform Ethical Dilemma Paper Assignment Help appeared first on Perfect Grade.

Implementing Ethical Decisions to Address the Ethical Dilemma Report

Implementing Ethical Decisions to Address the Ethical Dilemma Report

Imagine you are the decision maker of this      organization. You already have addressed the initial two steps of the      Prescriptive Model for ethical decision making found in Terry Cooper’s      text (see Chapter 2). You have provided the Descriptive Task and have      engaged in Defining the Ethical Issue.

Paper 3 Assignment: (7pages, not including the Title Page, Abstract, and Reference List)

• In summary format, reintroduce your organization, the      ethical challenge you are addressing, and the philosophical principles and      obligations that you have stated stakeholders must consider. Refer to your      first two papers for this requirement.
• Explain with sufficient detail Steps 3–5 of Cooper’s      model for ethical decision making:
  • Step 3: When considering the ethical decision,       identify the possible solutions.
  • Step 4: Describe the likely outcomes for each of these       options.
  • Step 5: Choose what you believe is the best option       and, including ethical principles, justify the reason for your decision.
• As you envision the implementation of your ethical      decision, discuss the:
  • Obstacles you anticipate
  • Steps you can take to minimize those possible       objections
  • Organizational structures, policies, or controls which       are essential to ensure enactment of your decision
• Integrate into your discussion how the decision you      identified contributes to positive social change. That is, how does your      solution contribute to the advancement of human rights and liberty? How      does it contribute to justice and expand equity?
• Add a conclusion that summarizes the key elements of      your paper. 

Score	Evaluation Criteria
Total score 100%	Meets all the criteria necessary for an A+ grade. Well formatted and instructions sufficiently followed. Well punctuated and grammar checked.
Above 90%	Ensures that all sections have been covered well, correct grammar, proofreads the work, answers all parts comprehensively, attentive to passive and active voice, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness, plagiarism-free
Above 75%	Meets most of the sections but has not checked for plagiarism. Partially meets the professor’s instructions, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 60%	Has not checked for plagiarism and has not proofread the project well. Out of context, can be cited for plagiarism and grammar mistakes and not correctly punctuated, fails to adhere to the professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 45%	Instructions are not well articulated. Has plenty of grammar mistakes and does not meet the quality standards needed. Needs to be revised. Not well punctuated
Less than 40%	Poor quality work that requires work that requires to be revised entirely. Does not meet appropriate quality standards and cannot be submitted as it is to the professor for marking. Definition of a failed grade
Alternative url	www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow/www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow/

Implementing Ethical Decisions to Address the Ethical Dilemma Report

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

The post Implementing Ethical Decisions to Address the Ethical Dilemma Report appeared first on Perfect Grade.

Oil and Gas Industry in Canada Ethical Dilemma Questions

Oil and Gas Industry in Canada Ethical Dilemma Questions

I’m working on a business question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.

As a customer service representative of a company in Oil and Gas Industry in Canada, you are working with one of your important clients, Government of Japan. The government of Japan is offering you an enticing deal to take the monopoly of doing business with you in the region to take the competitors away.  However, the client has made it clear that it wants a decision now and your internal warning system (i.e., your gut) is telling you that this deal might be an ethical dilemma.

Using what you have learned from Business ethics, briefly describe:

What is the ethical issue you face? Is this an ethical dilemma case? Please explain

How do you respond to the client? How will you think about the “dilemma” and respond to the client?

I’m working on a business question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.

As a customer service representative of a company in Oil and Gas Industry in Canada, you are working with one of your important clients, Government of Japan. The government of Japan is offering you an enticing deal to take the monopoly of doing business with you in the region to take the competitors away.  However, the client has made it clear that it wants a decision now and your internal warning system (i.e., your gut) is telling you that this deal might be an ethical dilemma.

Using what you have learned from Business ethics, briefly describe:

What is the ethical issue you face? Is this an ethical dilemma case? Please explain

How do you respond to the client? How will you think about the “dilemma” and respond to the client?

Score	Evaluation Criteria
Total score 100%	Meets all the criteria necessary for an A+ grade. Well formatted and instructions sufficiently followed. Well punctuated and grammar checked.
Above 90%	Ensures that all sections have been covered well, correct grammar, proofreads the work, answers all parts comprehensively, attentive to passive and active voice, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness, plagiarism-free
Above 75%	Meets most of the sections but has not checked for plagiarism. Partially meets the professor’s instructions, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 60%	Has not checked for plagiarism and has not proofread the project well. Out of context, can be cited for plagiarism and grammar mistakes and not correctly punctuated, fails to adhere to the professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 45%	Instructions are not well articulated. Has plenty of grammar mistakes and does not meet the quality standards needed. Needs to be revised. Not well punctuated
Less than 40%	Poor quality work that requires work that requires to be revised entirely. Does not meet appropriate quality standards and cannot be submitted as it is to the professor for marking. Definition of a failed grade
Alternative url	www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow/www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow/

Oil and Gas Industry in Canada Ethical Dilemma Questions

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

The post Oil and Gas Industry in Canada Ethical Dilemma Questions appeared first on Perfect Grade.