Rise of Cultural Collision Around the Atlantic Assignment Help

Rise of Cultural Collision Around the Atlantic Assignment Help

The paper should support a thesis statement with information gained from research or investigation.

The paper will not be just a report presenting information but will be a paper that carefully examines and presents your own historical interpretation of the topic you have chosen and your interpretation of the information you have gathered.

The paper may include consideration of problems and solutions, definition of key terms, or may refute arguments against your thesis statement.

It will be important to choose a topic of interest to you.

Approach this assignment with an open and skeptical mind, then form an opinion based on what you have discovered.

You must suspend beliefs while you are investigating and let the discoveries shape your opinion. (This is a thesis-finding approach.)

Once you have found your thesis, write the paper to support it.

You will use some of the following critical thinking skills in this process:

Choosing an appropriate topic, limiting the topic.

Gathering information, summarizing sources.

Analyzing and evaluating sources.

Defining key terms.

Synthesizing information, comparing and contrasting sources.

Testing a thesis, making a historical argument, using refutation.

Amassing support for a position.

Documenting sources.

Because this may be a longer paper than you have written before and a complex process is involved, it is recommended that you complete this paper using the following steps:

Choose a topic related to chapters covered in The American Yawp, (Chapters 1-15) that you would truly like to explore and that you are willing to spend some time on. Your chosen topic should be focused. Pose a question that you really want to answer. You may want to begin with more than one topic in mind.

Do some preliminary reading on the topic(s). You may begin with the textbook, then further explore the information available. Refine your topic. Summarize your topic, your interest in the topic, the questions you want to answer, and a hypothesis you want to test.

Gather information from a variety of sources. Use a minimum of four sources for your paper, and at least one must be a primary source.

Primary sources are contemporary to the times under investigation.

An example of a secondary source is our textbook, though the textbook also contains excerpts of primary sources, which you may use as a source in your paper.

Outline the results of your research and the plan for your paper (you are not required to submit the outline).

Write the final draft and be sure to include a Works Cited List, and use the correct MLA documentation style.

Grade Rubric

INTRODUCTION & THESIS: Includes a clear thesis statement, an assertion or position. Topic is original and manageable in a short research paper. /15

FOCUS AND DEVELOPMENT: Body of the essay focuses on this thesis and develops it fully, recognizing the complexity of issues and refuting arguments in opposition to the thesis. /20

SUPPORT AND SYNTHESIS: Uses sufficient and relevant evidence to support the thesis (and primary points), including facts, inferences, and judgments. Quotes, summarizes, and paraphrases accurately and effectively–appropriately introducing and explaining each quote. /25

RESOURCES: Shows a clear understanding of the sources; has evaluated each source and used it appropriately. Uses a wide variety of sources reflecting significant research. /10

CONVENTIONS: Uses MLA format correctly; includes internal citations and a Works Cited list; is free of errors. /15

CORRECTNESS AND STYLE: Introduces the topic in an interesting way; shows critical thinking and depth of understanding; uses appropriate tone; shows sophistication in language usage and sentence structure. /15

TOTAL: /100

Score	Evaluation Criteria
Total score 100%	Meets all the criteria necessary for an A+ grade. Well formatted and instructions sufficiently followed. Well punctuated and grammar checked.
Above 90%	Ensures that all sections have been covered well, correct grammar, proofreads the work, answers all parts comprehensively, attentive to passive and active voice, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness, plagiarism-free
Above 75%	Meets most of the sections but has not checked for plagiarism. Partially meets the professor’s instructions, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 60%	Has not checked for plagiarism and has not proofread the project well. Out of context, can be cited for plagiarism and grammar mistakes and not correctly punctuated, fails to adhere to the professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 45%	Instructions are not well articulated. Has plenty of grammar mistakes and does not meet the quality standards needed. Needs to be revised. Not well punctuated
Less than 40%	Poor quality work that requires work that requires to be revised entirely. Does not meet appropriate quality standards and cannot be submitted as it is to the professor for marking. Definition of a failed grade
Alternative url	www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow/www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow/

Rise of Cultural Collision Around the Atlantic Assignment Help

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

The post Rise of Cultural Collision Around the Atlantic Assignment Help appeared first on Perfect Grade.

MGMT Traditional Negligence of a Car Collision Discussion Assignment Help

MGMT Traditional Negligence of a Car Collision Discussion Assignment Help

write 150 words for each of the 3 cases

1. With Driver at the wheel, Driver and Passenger motored into town. Passenger fell asleep

during the trip. Driver parked 5 feet from a fire hydrant, next to a bank, in violation of a
municipal statute which bans parking within 10 feet of a fire hydrant. Driver went into
the bank to make a deposit. Passenger remained asleep. Trucker, who was driving
down the street where the bank is located, suddenly swerved the truck to avoid hitting a
dog which darted into the street and in front of Trucker’s truck. Trucker’s truck smashed
into Driver’s car resulting in a serious injury to Passenger.
Had Driver parked anywhere else, Trucker’s truck would not have smashed into Driver’s
car and injured Passenger. Passenger sued Driver in Negligence. Discuss whether
Passenger will recover in Negligence Per Se as against Driver. Passenger sued Trucker
in Negligence. Discuss whether Passenger will recover as against Trucker in Traditional
Negligence.

2.

Paul produces made the following statement to barbie buyer….”hey barbie, i am thinking of selling my complete supply of bananas for 10 cents per pound.” discuss your legal position on whether the statement is an offer. if so, how long does it remain an offer? now assume that Paul scribbled the above quoted words on the skin of a banana, gave the banana skin to barbie and told barbie that he was leaving soon for south America in order to get a new supply of bananas to sell. discuss your legal position on whether the “banana skin” is an offer. if so, how long does it remain an offer? now assume that Paul was in his garage working on his 1962 Studebaker lark. during this work session, Paul felt chilly. Paul lit a bundle of rags and wood chips in order to start a small flame so that he could warm up. unfortunately, because of the fire, the bananas that Paul and barbie had discussed blew up and turned into useless “banana mush.” now barbie wants to accept the banana offer. discuss the legal issues raised above. use legal rules and concepts to support your legal discussion.

3.

Phyllis fuller is 17 years old. Phyllis wants to buy a corvette automobile.
the price of the corvette is 82000 dollars. Phyllis works as a cash
register operator at the greasy spoon restaurant. Phyllis earns 12 dollars per hour. Phyllis
works 20 hours per week.

bob frappes are a corvette dealer. Phyllis went to bob’s dealership
and informed bob of Phyllis’ desire to buy a new corvette.

using relevant material as presented in the text, advise bob how
bob could structure this deal to make it work. include all legal rules

Score	Evaluation Criteria
Total score 100%	Meets all the criteria necessary for an A+ grade. Well formatted and instructions sufficiently followed. Well punctuated and grammar checked.
Above 90%	Ensures that all sections have been covered well, correct grammar, proofreads the work, answers all parts comprehensively, attentive to passive and active voice, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness, plagiarism-free
Above 75%	Meets most of the sections but has not checked for plagiarism. Partially meets the professor’s instructions, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 60%	Has not checked for plagiarism and has not proofread the project well. Out of context, can be cited for plagiarism and grammar mistakes and not correctly punctuated, fails to adhere to the professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 45%	Instructions are not well articulated. Has plenty of grammar mistakes and does not meet the quality standards needed. Needs to be revised. Not well punctuated
Less than 40%	Poor quality work that requires work that requires to be revised entirely. Does not meet appropriate quality standards and cannot be submitted as it is to the professor for marking. Definition of a failed grade
Alternative url	www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow/www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow/

MGMT Traditional Negligence of a Car Collision Discussion Assignment Help

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

The post MGMT Traditional Negligence of a Car Collision Discussion Assignment Help appeared first on Perfect Grade.