BUS6150 Research Citation Guide Discussion

BUS6150 Research Citation Guide Discussion

All assignments should include research that reliable, current, and with a substantive integration of citations. The Graduate Research Project (GRP) also requires that most of the sources are peer-reviewed.

Please seek to paraphrase, summarize, and synthesize what is learned from articles. Avoid direct quotes. There should rarely be a direct quote in discussions responses, video evaluations, and application assignments. For the GRP, one short direct quote for every five pages of body would be acceptable.

Requirements by Assignment Type

Responses to the weekly Discussion Questions:

Sources require in-text citations and complete references.

A minimum of one source is required.

The required text is satisfactory for support.

Other choices should be reliable and current.

Peer-reviewed is not required.

Responses to the weekly Video Evaluations:

Sources require in-text citations and complete references.

A minimum of two sources are required.

The video should always be cited and referenced.

One additional source is needed to support your evaluation.

The required text is satisfactory.

The other source should be reliable and current.

Peer-reviewed is not required.

Application Assignments (short papers):

Sources require in-text citations and complete references.

A minimum of three sources are required.

The required text should be included as one choice.

The other two choices should be reliable and current.

Peer-reviewed is not required.

Citations should be included in the synopsis, analysis, and summary.

Graduate Research Project (GRP):

Sources require in-text citations and complete references.

All sources must be current and reliable.

Fifteen sources are the minimum requirement; however, most successful papers have twenty or more excellent sources with substantial citation integration throughout. Overall, at least eight peer-reviewed/scholarly sources must be utilized.

The introduction must have citations and at least one peer-reviewed citation to set the tone for subsequent research. It is also very common to cite documents regarding the organization, when applicable.

The literature review should include at least six peer-reviewed articles (eight-ten is more common). Overall, this section should have at least four sources per topic/theme to ensure adequate viewpoints are included.

The analysis should include at least six peer-reviewed articles (it is ok if they are the same ones used in the literature review). Overall, this section should have at least four sources per topic/theme to ensure adequate comparison, contrasting, and analysis is achieved.

The synthesis/integration must have citations. There isn’t a peer-review requirement here, but many students use previous sources along with additional articles to support recommendations. Overall, this section should have at least four sources.

The conclusion must have citations and at least one scholarly citation to support the research process and ultimate call to action.

Description by Source Type

Reliable articles:

All referenced articles must be reliable.

Cited source must have an author and a date of publication.

Exception: There are times that is it necessary to cite an internal company document, company website, government website, etc. Such sources will usually not have an author or date of publication. This is acceptable; however, such sources/citations will not count toward the minimum requirements.

Citations from sources as dictionaries, about.com, Wikipedia, and encyclopedias are not relevant or appropriate for graduate assignments. These should be avoided. If used, they will not count toward the minimum requirements.

Citations from compilation sites such as smallbusinesschronicle.com, businessballs.com, etc. are NOT deemed reliable because they often pull articles to their sites without explicit permission. However, if you find something in one of these compilation sites, you may be able to locate the ORIGINAL article via the library – that would be acceptable.

Current articles:

The references should also be “current.”

Constrain your search parameters to the last five years. [Last 2-3 is even better and sometimes required – please see specific assignment requirements!]

The world is changing rapidly, and we must remain current with trends and research.

Remember, it takes time to do research and get the article published; thus, data in journal articles is often several years old when published!

Peer-reviewed (scholarly) articles:

Peer-reviewed means that there is an expert panel of scholars that does a double- or triple-blind review of an article – this may be referred to as juried or refereed as well.

Each expert provides critical feedback and assessment and then recommends to an editor or publisher if the article should be published in their scholarly journal.

The process produces a higher level of academic quality.

Scholarly or peer-reviewed research are found in scholarly journals and will often have “journal” in the publication title. Example: Journal of Management.

Scholarly articles are usually 15-30 pages long. Most will include an abstract, introduction, literature review, research methodology, research results, discussion, and recommendations.

Peer-reviewed articles typically have 2 or more authors.

The BEST and most reliable method to locate is through the library; be sure to use the “Advanced Search” option and constrain your search by checking the box for “Scholarly (Peer Reviewed) Journals.”

Substantive Integration of Citations

It is important to have a solid integration of citations throughout assignments .

Do not just toss in a quote for the introduction or conclusion and believe you have satisfied this requirement.

Example, in the Application Assignments, there must be a substantive use of citations in your synopsis to create a foundation; in the analysis to provide compare & contrast information; and in the summary to strengthen and support your position.

It is important to have quality of citation integration not just that you have cited the required number and/or type of sources.

Conducting a Successful Library Search

Select Articles & Databases – such as EBSCO and ProQuest

Always conduct an Advanced Search

Command line 1 – enter the most important keyword(s) and request that it is in the title of the article. For example, transformational leadership.

Command line 2 – enter the next most important keyword(s) and request that it is in the abstract of the article. For example, healthcare.

Check the box for Limit to Full Text – this avoids frustration because you will review only articles that you can fully access versus merely an abstract.

Select a Publication date of Last 3 years – this will ensure it is current. If there are not sufficient results, you can ask for 4 or 5 years.

If required, limit to search to Peer Reviewed/Scholarly – important for the GRP.

BUS6150 Research Citation Guide Discussion

Score	Evaluation Criteria
Total score 100%	Meets all the criteria necessary for an A+ grade. Well formatted and instructions sufficiently followed. Well punctuated and grammar checked.
Above 90%	Ensures that all sections have been covered well, correct grammar, proofreads the work, answers all parts comprehensively, attentive to passive and active voice, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness, plagiarism-free
Above 75%	Meets most of the sections but has not checked for plagiarism. Partially meets the professor’s instructions, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 60%	Has not checked for plagiarism and has not proofread the project well. Out of context, can be cited for plagiarism and grammar mistakes and not correctly punctuated, fails to adhere to the professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 45%	Instructions are not well articulated. Has plenty of grammar mistakes and does not meet the quality standards needed. Needs to be revised. Not well punctuated
Less than 40%	Poor quality work that requires work that requires to be revised entirely. Does not meet appropriate quality standards and cannot be submitted as it is to the professor for marking. Definition of a failed grade
Alternative url	www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow/www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow/

BUS6150 Research Citation Guide Discussion

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

The post BUS6150 Research Citation Guide Discussion appeared first on Perfect Grade.

Recognizing the Palestinian Community in Philadelphia Citation

Recognizing the Palestinian Community in Philadelphia Citation

I’m working on a political science report and need a sample draft to help me learn.

need a citation for city council created with the outline/example below that recognizes the Palestinian community that resides in the city of philadelphia as a community that has contributed culturally, socially and economically to the city and recognizes them. The example below should be how the format should go

CITATION

Honoring Denise Loray Valentine

The Council of the City of Philadelphia is pleased and proud to recognize and honor Denise Loray Valentine for her cultural and social contributions to the city of Philadelphia.

Whereas, Denise Loray Valentine was an accomplished master Griot/storyteller, activist, historian, historical performer, educator, and mother of three who was dedicated to uncovering, preserving, and sharing the history and stories of the African diaspora. She was born on September 4th, 1959 and transitioned on March 22nd, 2020; and

Whereas, Denise Valentine was the founder of the Philadelphia Middle Passage Ceremony and Port Marker Project and was instrumental in the placement of the Pennsylvania Slave Trade historical marker at Penn’s Landing. She also served as the Project Coordinator of the annual Ancestral Remembrance Day, honoring the memory and sacrifices of enslaved Africans and encouraging discussion, reflection, and community initiatives toward reparation and reconciliation. Her work helped Philadelphia earn the prestigious designation as a United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) “Site of Memory;” and

Whereas, Denise was a respected member of Philadelphia’s own Keepers of the Culture, where she earned the name “Story Mama,” as well as the National Association of Black Storytellers, the PA Humanities Council Speakers Bureau, and a member of the Pennsylvania Council of the Arts. Denise also served as Project Editor for the Philadelphia Assembled Project through the Philadelphia Museum of Art. Working alongside Reconstruction Inc., she led formerly incarcerated men in building storytelling skills grounded in African and African-American traditions to help them tell their own stories; and

Whereas, Denise dedicated her life to human rights and social justice and was an active part of the Free Mumia Movement, the Anti-Apartheid movement, and several others. She has performed in several countries including Jamaica, the West Indies, South Africa, and, most recently, the Netherlands. Her motto, “Stories are like roots to the past and wings to the future,” conveyed her understanding of the importance of stories to our collective humanity and their ability to ground us in our history while giving us courage and vision to dream of a better future.

Therefore, by virtue of this Citation, the Council of the City of Philadelphia does hereby recognize and honor Denise Loray Valentine for her cultural and social contributions to the city of Philadelphia.

Recognizing the Palestinian Community in Philadelphia Citation

Score	Evaluation Criteria
Total score 100%	Meets all the criteria necessary for an A+ grade. Well formatted and instructions sufficiently followed. Well punctuated and grammar checked.
Above 90%	Ensures that all sections have been covered well, correct grammar, proofreads the work, answers all parts comprehensively, attentive to passive and active voice, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness, plagiarism-free
Above 75%	Meets most of the sections but has not checked for plagiarism. Partially meets the professor’s instructions, follows professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 60%	Has not checked for plagiarism and has not proofread the project well. Out of context, can be cited for plagiarism and grammar mistakes and not correctly punctuated, fails to adhere to the professor’s classwork materials, easy to read, well punctuated, correctness
Above 45%	Instructions are not well articulated. Has plenty of grammar mistakes and does not meet the quality standards needed. Needs to be revised. Not well punctuated
Less than 40%	Poor quality work that requires work that requires to be revised entirely. Does not meet appropriate quality standards and cannot be submitted as it is to the professor for marking. Definition of a failed grade
Alternative url	www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow/www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow/

Recognizing the Palestinian Community in Philadelphia Citation

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

The post Recognizing the Palestinian Community in Philadelphia Citation appeared first on Perfect Grade.